Legal Opinion

Schenck v. School District No. 34

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 7, 1917No. 21,162PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Hamilton district court; George J. DOWNER, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action by Engene Schenck, sr., to enjoin the collection of a tax levied for the purpose of paying two judgments rendered against the defendant school district No. 34 of Hamilton county. Plaintiff appeals from the ruling sustaining a demurrer to his evidence and the holding that the judgments sought to be enjoined are not open to collateral attack.

The judgments on account of which the tax was levied were obtained by Ross, who built a new school building for the district, and by Ford, who furnished the material for its…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Crouse v. . McVickarNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. White v. CrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Electric Plaster Co. v. Blue Rapids City TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. McCormick v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pulley v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. Griebel v. School District No. 6Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Page v. SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API