Kisthardt v. Betts

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

The facts of this case are a bit complicated. However, to determine the question now before us, it is not necessary to review them in detail. After a verdict for plaintiff, the lower court entered judgment n. o. v. for defendants, and plaintiff appealed.

The sole question for our decision is whether the testimony was such as to require the submission of the case to the jury. The court beloAV held that it was not, that a single statement made by plaintiff, whicb of itself was open to a double interpretation, was an admission which concluded the case in favor of…