Legal Opinion · Dissent

Luskin v. Department of Employment

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1979No. 12830Published

1DissentBakes, Justice

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the second appeals examiner and the Industrial Commission lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the issue of appellant’s alleged willful misrepresentation. The majority’s reasoning in my opinion finds no support in the Employment Security Act. It will also have a detrimental effect on the department’s ability to deal with claimants who willfully misrepresent facts in order to obtain unemployment benefits.

I

The determination of a claimant’s eligibility for unemployment compensation is not necessarily a one time affair. A claimant must establish…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Samuel A. Haize, D/B/A "Marlene Store" v. Hanover Insurance Co. And Caribbean Atlantic InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  3. Local 1494 of the International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of Coeur D'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Boughton v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API