Bennett v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORNISH, Judge:
The appellant was convicted of Burglary in the First Degree, After Former Conviction of a Felony, in the District Court of Oklahoma County. He was sentenced to twenty-five (25) years’ imprisonment.
The appellant first argues that the eyewitness identification resulting from a one-on-one show-up was unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identification. The appellant concedes he did not object to the in-court identification and did not request a cautionary instruction on witness identification.
A leading case interpreting the propriety of in-court…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bobby Russell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Allen CoadesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Pisano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Summers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
- Harrolle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988