Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided August 10, 1982No. F-81-535PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNISH, Judge:

The appellant was convicted of Burglary in the First Degree, After Former Conviction of a Felony, in the District Court of Oklahoma County. He was sentenced to twenty-five (25) years’ imprisonment.

The appellant first argues that the eyewitness identification resulting from a one-on-one show-up was unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identification. The appellant concedes he did not object to the in-court identification and did not request a cautionary instruction on witness identification.

A leading case interpreting the propriety of in-court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bobby Russell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Allen CoadesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. Pisano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Summers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. Harrolle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  3. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API