Legal Opinion

Wharton v. DuBose

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 7, 1984No. 84-1074PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

We dismiss this appeal of the trial court’s order granting a motion for rehearing because it is an interlocutory appeal of which this court lacks jurisdiction. The First District Court of Appeal dismissed a similar appeal on the same ground in Ford Motor Company v. Averill, 355 So.2d 220 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). We are aware of no change in the law since the Averill decision that would affect the outcome.

Appellant contends that an order granting a motion for rehearing either is a final order and thus immediately appealable, or is the equivalent of an order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Emergency Amendments to Rules, Etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. AverillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Solman-Staropoli v. CalifanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API