Legal Opinion
Arline v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 30, 1981No. 80-1665PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment and sentence. However, we remand for clarification of the order relating to the trial judge’s statement that he retained jurisdiction on the sexual battery charge, inasmuch as he did not state with individual particularity the basis for retaining such jurisdiction as is required by section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1979).
SCHEB, C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Ragen v. Paramount Hudson, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983