Legal Opinion

L.K. Comstock & Co. v. Perini Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 7, 1995No. 95 Civ. 1117 (DC)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

CHIN, District Judge.

In this diversity action, the parties have cross-moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff L.K. Comstock Company, Inc. (“Com-stock”) argues that the construction contract at issue unambiguously obligates defendants Perini Corporation (“Perini”) and Perini/O & G II (the “Joint Venture”) to perform certain work. Conversely, defendants claim that the contract plainly delegates the disputed work to Comstock. Because I find that the contract at issue is subject to two reasonable interpretations, the motions for summary judgment must be denied. Also, defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  3. Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Consarc Corporation v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Dahlberg v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API