L.K. Comstock & Co. v. Perini Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHIN, District Judge.
In this diversity action, the parties have cross-moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff L.K. Comstock Company, Inc. (“Com-stock”) argues that the construction contract at issue unambiguously obligates defendants Perini Corporation (“Perini”) and Perini/O & G II (the “Joint Venture”) to perform certain work. Conversely, defendants claim that the contract plainly delegates the disputed work to Comstock. Because I find that the contract at issue is subject to two reasonable interpretations, the motions for summary judgment must be denied. Also, defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Seiden Associates, Inc. v. Anc Holdings, Inc., American National Can Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Consarc Corporation v. Marine Midland Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Dahlberg v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.