Legal Opinion

Hines v. National Gum & Mica Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 27, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proskauer, J.:

Plaintiff appeals from an order under the Civil Practice Act, section 193, bringing in Gerhard & Hey, Inc., as a party defendant.

The action is based upon a written agreement to pay a stipulated sum as freight on merchandise from San Francisco to Japan. It appears from the pleadings that the merchandise was originally shipped by the defendant through Gerhard & Hey, Inc., as forwarding agents; that on arrival in San Francisco its further shipment was stopped by an order of the War Trade Board treating Gerhard & Hey, Inc., as an alien enemy; that after a substantial interval of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hotel Antlers, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gilbert v. MehrtensNew York Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API