Opinion No. (1999)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Representative Paulk,
¶ 0 This Office has received your letter asking for an official Opinion addressing, in effect, the following questions:
1. Has the Legislature preempted the regulation of personsengaged in boiler and pressure vessel service, repair, andinstallation, through passage of the Boiler and Pressure VesselSafety Act, 40 O.S. 1991 and Supp. 1998, §§ 141.1-141.19,such that any regulation by municipalities is prohibited? 2. Are municipalities authorized to require payment of alicensure fee or passage of a licensure examination if an entityor person is licensed under the Boiler…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Ex Parte HiggsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.