Every Penny Counts, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge.
Challenging the validity of claims 1 and 2 of the '217 patent and claims 4 and 6 of the '849 patent, Wells Fargo moves (Doc. 60) for partial summary judgment on the defense of indefiniteness. “Indefiniteness is a matter of claim construction, and the same principles that generally govern claim construction are applicable to deter*1288mining whether allegedly indefinite claim language is subject to construction.” Praxair, Inc. v. ATMI, Inc., 548 F.3d 1306, 1319 (Fed.Cir.2008).
1. '217 Patent — “The Account”
Wells Fargo states, “The term ‘the account’ in claim 1…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bose Corporation v. Jbl, Inc. And Infinity Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.Com, L.P.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2013
- Tennison v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Interval Licensing LLC v. Aol, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Viva Healthcare Packaging USA Inc. v. CTL Packaging USA Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Kyowa Hakko Bio, Co., Ltd v. Ajinomoto Co., Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.