Legal Opinion

Helnore v. Department of Natural Resources

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 23, 2005No. 04-0602PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. James and Constance Helnore own two lots that have been designated as wetlands. They previously built a house on one lot and now want to build a house on the other. Because they have been informed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources that a water quality certificate is unlikely to be granted — a condition precedent to a permit to build —they have instituted this action, claiming that the designation of their property as wetlands constituted a taking. We hold that they first have to pursue administrative remedies, beginning with an application for a WQC. The circuit court made…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Nodell Investment Corp. v. City of GlendaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Schlieper v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. Eberle v. Dane County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southport Commons, LLC v. DOTWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Sliwinski v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API