Helnore v. Department of Natural Resources
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
¶ 1. James and Constance Helnore own two lots that have been designated as wetlands. They previously built a house on one lot and now want to build a house on the other. Because they have been informed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources that a water quality certificate is unlikely to be granted — a condition precedent to a permit to build —they have instituted this action, claiming that the designation of their property as wetlands constituted a taking. We hold that they first have to pursue administrative remedies, beginning with an application for a WQC. The circuit court made…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Nodell Investment Corp. v. City of GlendaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Schlieper v. State Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Eberle v. Dane County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Southport Commons, LLC v. DOTWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Sliwinski v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009