Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Rille v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 18, 2011No. 4:04CV00989-BRWPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BILLY ROY WILSON, District Judge.
Pending is Relators’ Motion for Determination of Relators’ Share of Settlement Proceeds (Doc. No. 102). The Government has responded, 1 and Relators have replied. 2 The Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as set out below.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
Norman Rille and Neal Roberts (“Relators”) filed this qui tam action, along with several others, on September 17, 2004. 3 Their Second Amended Complaint brought claims on behalf of the United States Government (the “Government”) against Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) and others 4 who…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Burr v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- United States Ex Rel. Alderson v. Quorum Health Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. Coughlin v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- United States Ex Rel. Johnson-Pochardt v. Rapid City Regional HospitalDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hunt v. Cochise Consultancy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States ex rel. Johnson v. Universal Health Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2012