Legal Opinion

Hopson v. Oliver

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 4, 1927Published

1Opinion

OPINION OP REHEARING.

In support of the petition for -rehearing filed by appellee it is insisted that the manifest purpose of the act was not only to authorize the construction of the proposed improvement, but to maintain it, and that this can be done only by the imposition and collection of' assessments in addition to those levied to pay the original construction cost, and that the act creating the district and the act amendatory thereof conferred this power.

There can be no question that authority might be conferred upon an improvement district to. maintain the improvement and to levy and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rosselot v. Greene & Lawrence Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API