Legal Opinion

Clusman v. Wall-Murray Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 13, 1943PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Donges, J.

The decree under appeal was entered on November 17th, 1942, on a bill for specific performance of an agreement to convey real estate. There were six defendants, Wall-Murray Corp. and Sydney J. Hollander, defendants-appellants; Pearl K. Eerguson and Ralph R. Eerguson, her husband; Essex Title Guarantee and Trust Company and Spring Realty Co.

On the 8th day of September, 1941, the complainants entered into a written agreement with defendant-appellant Wall-Murray Corp., by which it agreed to sell and .complainants agreed to purchase the lands and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Blick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  2. Blick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API