Kantner v. Saul
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JONATHAN MICHAEL KANTNER, : Civil No. 3:21-CV-309 : Plaintiff : : v. : (Magistrate Judge Carlson) : KILOLO KIJAKAZI, : Acting Commissioner of Social Security1 : : Defendant : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction The Supreme Court has underscored for us the limited scope of our substantive review when considering Social Security appeals, noting that: The phrase “substantial evidence” is a “term of art” used throughout administrative law to describe how courts are to review agency factfinding. T-Mobile South, LLC v.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.