Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Anderson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 21, 1987No. 56,624; CM 449042Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSullivan, Judge

Appellant pleaded guilty to willfully suffering an Army truck to be damaged, in violation of Article 108(3), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 908(3). This codal provision states:

§ 908. Art. 108. Military property of United States — Loss, damage, destruction, or wrongful disposition

Any person subject to this chapter who, without proper authority—(1) sells or otherwise disposes of;(2) willfully or through neglect damages, destroys, or loses; or(3) willfully or through neglect suffers to be lost, damaged, destroyed, sold, or wrongfully disposed of;

any military property of the United States, shall be punished…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. TilleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API