State v. Larson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Justice:
Defendant challenges the constitutionality of the minimum mandatory sentencing scheme of the child sodomy statute 1 on the grounds of equal protection, cruel and unusual punishment, and vagueness. He also challenges the propriety of his sentence for sexual abuse of a child.
Defendant was charged with one count of sodomy 2 on his five-year-old stepdaughter and one count of sexual abuse 3 of his four-year-old stepdaughter. The offenses were committed in defendant’s home, where the victims had resided since defendant’s marriage to their mother five months previously. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Hoyle v. MonsonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. EgbertUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. GerrishUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- Blum v. StoneUtah Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LorrahUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- David L. Larson v. Hank Galetka, Warden, Utah State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- State v. SimmonsUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SimmonsUtah Supreme Court · 1988