Legal Opinion
Dealy-Doe-Eyes Maddux v. Schur
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 17, 2005PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Crew III, J.P.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Best, J.), entered April 12, 2004 in Fulton County, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.
Plaintiff initially retained defendant to represent her in a tax certiorari case against the Town of Oppenheim, Fulton County, regarding the overassessment of property taxes for years 1994, 1995 and 1996. Defendant successfully negotiated a reduction in plaintiffs assessment and, by order entered August 1, 1997, Supreme Court directed, among other things, that plaintiff be issued a refund for the years in question.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tabner v. DrakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Ehlinger v. Ruberti, Girvin & Ferlazzo, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maddux v. SchurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Amodeo v. Gellert & Quartararo, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Eisenberger v. SeptimusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Arnold v. DevaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Maddux v. SchurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.