Rhim v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Dissent
*54Dissenting Opinion
Sullivan, P.J.
— I respectfully dissent from the refusal of the majority to consider Rhim’s standing to assert that the Indiana Abortion Statute is unconstitutional. Assuming argu-endo that Rhim has standing — a question briefed by the parties and very much at issue in this appeal but which the majority ignores — the merits of her constitutional argument should be treated.
Notwithstanding the majority’s emphasis of form over substance, the constitutional argument, I believe, is fairly contained within the Motion to Correct Error and its accompanying memorandum.
As stated by our…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Board of Com'rs v. Kokomo City Plan Com'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Cheaney v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Board of Com'rs, Cty. of Howard v. Kokomo City Pl. C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
- Rhim v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975