Legal Opinion

Doud, Sons & Co. v. Duluth Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 1893No. 8383PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant, the Duluth Milling Company, a corporation, from a judgment of the District Court of St. Louis County, J. D. Ensign, J., entered December 15, 1892, against it for $7,062.18. The plaintiff, Doud, Sons & Co., a corporation, on May 2, 1891, entered into a contract with defendant to build cooper shops and make barrels therein for it for one year from January 1, 1892. Defendant then contemplated constructing a large flouring mill on Lot 4, Sec. 10, T. 48, E.…

Read the full summary

Appeal by defendant, the Duluth Milling Company, a corporation, from a judgment of the District Court of St. Louis County, J. D. Ensign, J., entered December 15, 1892, against it for $7,062.18. The plaintiff, Doud, Sons & Co., a corporation, on May 2, 1891, entered into a contract with defendant to build cooper shops and make barrels therein for it for one year from January 1, 1892. Defendant then contemplated constructing a large flouring mill on Lot 4, Sec. 10, T. 48, E. 15, on the Wisconsin side of the St. Louis River and the cooper shops were to be built there. The plaintiff expended…

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

This action was brought in the district court of St. Louis county to recover damages for alleged breach of a contract entered into between the parties May 2, 1891.

*56One of tbe alleged causes of action is for money expended and labor performed pursuant to tbe terms of a written contract, wbicb is made a part of tbe complaint. It is conceded by tbe counsel for tbe appellant that tbis court cannot disturb tbe judgment of tbe court below, to tbe amount of $1,157.38, rendered for sucb money expended and labor performed by plaintiff for tbe defendant by virtue of tbe terms of tbeir contract. But tbe…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peach v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Davie's v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Thorp Loan and Thrift Co. v. MorseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Beatty v. Howe Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Force v. GottwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API