Legal Opinion

Conversion Chemical Corp. v. Dr.-Ing. Max Schloetter Fabrik Fur Galvanotechnik

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 18, 1969No. Civ. No. 13266Published

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION FOR PRODUCTION

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

The plaintiff moves for an order requiring Lea-Ronal, Inc., a garnishee, to produce documents pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 34. The question presented is whether a garnishee is a party within the meaning of that rule.

The concept of a “party” in Rule 34 has been held to extend to a liability insurer of the. defendant. Wilson v. David, 21 F.R.D. 217 (W.D.Mich. 1957); Simper v. Trimble, 9 F.R.D. 598 (W.D.Mo.1949); Martin v. N. V. Nederlandsche Amerikaansche Stoomvaart Maatchappij, 8 F.R.D. 363 (S.D.N.Y. 1948). The interest of a garnishee in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simper v. TrimbleDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
  2. Wilson v. DavidDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1957
  3. Martin v. N. V. Nederlandsche Amerikaansche Stoomvaart MaatchappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API