Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Richardson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1974No. 35118PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant, James Richardson, was convicted in the City Court of the City of St. Louis of a violation of § 772.010 Revised Code of the City of St. Louis, 1960, for selling; or offering for sale “sex-inciting devices” and he appealed to the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. § 479.110, RSMo, V.A.M.S. Thereafter, on October 27, 1972, after trial before the court, he was found guilty and the court assessed sentence of “One hundred dollars and costs” and he was given ten days to file a motion for a new trial. On November 6, the defendant was given an additional thirty days, until…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SummersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. State v. EzellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. State v. GrimesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Postscript Enterprises, Inc. v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  2. Postscript Enterprises, Inc. v. WhaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API