Legal Opinion
San Diego Unified Port District v. Gianturco
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 30, 1978No. Civ. 78-97-SPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD J. SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief initially brought by the San Diego Unified Port District (“Port District”) against the California Department of Transportation and two of its officers (collectively referred to as “Department”). The focus in the litigation is San Diego International Airport, Lindbergh Field, which is owned and operated by the Port District. The Department seeks to impose an extended curfew at Lindbergh Field which the Port District contends is unconstitutional.
The parties have raised numerous issues which require…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Milliken v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Parden v. Terminal Railway of Alabama State Docks DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- San Diego Unified Port District, and Air Transport Association of America, Intervening v. Adriana GianturcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Star-Kist Foods, Inc. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Andrews v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- City of New Rochelle v. Town of MamaroneckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- City of Grass Valley v. Cohen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.