Legal Opinion
Freydberg Bros. v. Corey
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
In Matter of Kelley (240 N. Y. 74, 79) the Court of Appeals declared that a provision for arbitration may be broad enough to permit the arbitrator, himself to determine whether or not he possesses jurisdiction of a given dispute. The court cited as authority Willesford v. Watson (8 Ch. App. Cas. [L. R.] 473), in which a provision for arbitration, which was not as broad as *561the one involved in the instant ease, was held to authorize the arbitrator himself to determine whether the disputes between the parties were within the scope of his jurisdiction. In the case at bar the provision for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Matter of KelleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- In re the Arbitration of & Concerning Certain Matters in Difference between Pine Street Realty Co. & CoutroulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Matter of Pine Street Realty Company v. Nik CoutroulasNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- In Re Arbitration Between Pierce & Brown Buick Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
- In re the Arbitration between Staklinski & Pyramid Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- Freydberg Bros. v. CoreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Pocketbook Workers Union, Local 1 v. Centra Leather Goods Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re the Arbitration of Controversies Between Barrett & MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.