Legal Opinion

Nuckolls v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 2015No. 2014-KA-00311-SCTPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, Presiding Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. In this thirteen-count, video-voyeurism bench trial, the parties agreed to forego calling witnesses and to have the trial judge decide the case on a submission of stipulated facts. The stipulation omitted any reference td> • where ten of the thirteen counts took place. So, because the State failed to prove venue as to those ten counts, we must- reverse them. We affirm Nuckolls’s remaining convictions.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2. On February 14, 2012, a DeSoto County grand jury indicted Samuel Nuc-kolls for thirteen violations of Mississippi…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hughes v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Gillett v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Conner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Smith v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Terry Roberson v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Sidney Humbles v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  3. Haman Construction, LLC v. Marshall County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2026
  4. Hosan M. Azomani v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Hosan M. Azomani v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API