American Samoa Government v. Sanerivi
High Court of American Samoa
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PUBLIC FUNDS TO INVESTIGATE WITNESSES
Defendants bring this motion for funding to interview witnesses in (Independent ) Samoa. Defendants have been declared indigent and have been appointed public counsel. Their motion, therefore, falls under the ambit of AM. SAMOA Rev. Const, art. 1 § 6, which provides every defendant with the right to have the effective assistance of counsel. See Suisala v. Moaali’itele, 6 A.S.R.2d 15 (Trial Div. 1987) (incorporating *342Federal effective assistance of counsel standard); A.S.C.A. §§ 46.0502 and 46.1001.
The effective assistance of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. John Andrew Greschner, Ronnie Joe CriswellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Charles Anthony HartfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Robert Theodore BassCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.