Legal Opinion

Padgett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 1990No. 86-2092Published

1Per curiam

The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in departing from sentencing guidelines in sentencing defendant for a violation of probation when departure was based on a crime for which defendant was acquitted. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Bell v. State, 545 So.2d 861 (Fla.1989); Tuthill v. State, 518 So.2d 1300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). A one cell increase, as provided in the guidelines, is the only allowable departure, Hamilton v. State, 548 So.2d 234 (Fla.1989); Mitchell v. State, 554 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Fla.R.Crim P. 3.701(d)(14), if departure is appropriate.

Sen…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lambert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API