Legal Opinion

Ford v. Baltimore City Sheriff's Office

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 27, 2002No. 2514, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

On March 3, 1999, appellant, Earnest Ford, filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City naming the Baltimore City Sheriffs Office and Baltimore City Deputy Sheriffs Arthur Phillips, Mary Krall, and Arthur Seabrook as defendants in a suit alleging counts of assault, battery, negligence, negligent trespass, intentional trespass, false arrest, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent training and supervision, and violations of the Maryland State Declaration of Rights. Thereafter, appellant amended his complaint to remove the Baltimore City Sheriffs…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Young v. City of Mount RanierCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Edward Nero v. Marilyn MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  2. Cooper v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Hines v. FrenchCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Royal Investment Group, LLC v. WangCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API