State v. Villiard
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRIOD, Justice:
Appeal from a rape conviction. Affirmed.
The jury’s verdict was arrived .at after deliberation as to controverted evidence, a substantial portion of which amply supported it, — in which event we affirm,' unless there was prejudicial error attendant thereto. In so concluding we must and do hold that the point on appeal urging insufficiency of the evidence is without merit.
Other points urged were that 1) failure of defendant to except to the giving of or failure to give certain instructions does not prevent reversal, — with which general assertion we agree if the error is so…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. CoboUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. CastilloUtah Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. MitchellUtah Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. HougensenUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CouchUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. International AmusementsUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Heinlin v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. International AmusementsUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. International AmusementsUtah Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.