Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Amirpanahi

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 28, 1988No. 19221-3-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

The Amirpanahis appeal from a summary judgment entered against them in an action for declaratory relief with respect to their right to litigate damages due under the uninsured motorist provisions of their insurance policy. They allege that the trial court erred in concluding that they were collaterally estopped from asserting damages in excess of those awarded in a prior arbitration. We agree and reverse.

The appellants were injured in an automobile accident which was caused by an insured of Grange Insurance Company. The Grange policy had limits of $50,000. Grange and appellants entered into a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Elovich v. Nationwide InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Sullivan v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. Almeida v. State Farm Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. Dunlap v. WildCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Northwest Independent Forest Manufacturers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Department of Ecology v. Yakima Reservation Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API