Legal Opinion

Moran v. Ferchland

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1920PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action to recover a savings bank deposit,

1Opinion of the CourtLazansky, J.

Finding these facts: (1) The original deposit in trust for defendant; (2) the knowledge of defendant thereof; (3) control of passbook by-decedent; (4) declarations of decedent in presence of defendant and to friends that defendant would have her money when decedent died; (5) the withdrawal of the entire account and the redeposit under the same names without considering the reason therefor claimed by plaintiff; the withdrawal of various sums with the knowledge of defendant or by the defendant acting for *2decedent; (6) decedent’s financial condition at the time of the deposit and her manner of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tierney v. . FitzpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Stockert v. Dry Dock Savings InstitutionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Kelly v. . BeersNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Tierney v. FitzpatrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rodgers EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. In re the Estate of SchrierNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. In re the Estate of MannixNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of PomaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
  5. In re the Estate of SteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API