Brokaw v. Brokaw
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
This appeal arises from a modification of a child support order in which Joseph R. Brokaw was required to pay $140 weekly until his son had reached 21 years of age or had completed his undergraduate college education. On appeal, Brokaw raises basically one issue for our consideration. Did the trial court err when it ordered him to continue making support payments after his son’s eighteenth birthday?
We affirm.
The facts relevant to our disposition of the case indicate that a Decree of Dissolution was entered on behalf of Nancy Brokaw (now Hayes) and Joseph R. Brokaw on December 2,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stitle v. StitleIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
- Ross v. RossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Crescent City Aviation v. Beverly Bank of ChicagoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
- Haycraft v. HaycraftIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Kniffen v. CourtneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Whitman v. WhitmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Meehan v. MeehanIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Harbour v. Arelco, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Glasgo v. GlasgoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Dunson v. DunsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.