Legal Opinion

Hurwitz v. Starwich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1924No. 18319PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

For sometime prior to September 16, 1920, one A. Greenberg owned and operated three millinery stores situated in separate buildings in the city of Seattle, which buildings he held under leases. The businesses were conducted under separate names; one known as “Máximes,” another as the “Fashion Shop,” and the third as the “Criterion.” Greenberg being in failing circumstances and unable to meet the obligations due his creditors, if not in fact insolvent, on the day named made a common law assignment of all of his stock of goods, wares, merchandise and fixtures, in the stores above mentioned,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. McAvoy v. JenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Nyman v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Holt Manufacturing Co. v. BenningtonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Gilbert v. Morgan Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Coeur D'Alene v. MarshWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Warner v. Citizens' Bank of AnacortesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API