Legal Opinion
Petersen v. Valenzano
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 9, 1992No. 89 Civ. 5346 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Pro se Defendant and judgment debtor Marcello Valenzano (“Valenzano”) has moved, pursuant to Rule 60(b), Fed.R.Civ. P., for reconsideration of the Court’s Opinion of May 21, 1992, granting Plaintiff and judgment creditor Brian Petersen’s (“Petersen”) motion for summary judgment. See Petersen v. Vallenzano [sic], No. 89 Civ. 5346 (RWS), 1992 WL 116427, 1992 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 6922 (S.D.N.Y.1992). Valenzano also has moved for a stay pursuant to Rule 62(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., pending the disposition of the Rule 60(b) motion. For the reasons set forth below, Valenzano’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Vito Matarese v. Eugene Lefevre, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional Facility, and Robert Abrams, Attorney General, State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Gollust v. MendellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fulani v. BradyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Bridgeway Corp. v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Salomon v. 1498 Third Realty Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Petersen v. VallenzanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Petersen v. VallenzanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994