Hardware Mut. Ins. Co. v. Dunwoody
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, District Judge.
In a complaint for declaratory relief, the appellant, a corporation formed under the laws of Minnesota, asked that it he adjudged not liable under a certain fire insurance policy. Each appellee is a citizen of California.
So* far as they are pertinent to our view of the case, the facts have been stipulated as we here recite them.
On or about September 24, 1948, the appellant issued and delivered to* the appellee Mildred A. Dunwoody a policy of fire insurance covering two buildings in Chico, California, in the amount of $10,000. The buildings were totally destroyed by fire…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northern Trust Co. v. Consolidated Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Firemen's Insurance v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1935
- Home Ins v. HartshornMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
- Fire Ass'n v. SchellengerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Skauge v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
- Barnes v. Independent Automobile Dealers Ass'n of California Health & Welfare Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Delfino R. Olivas, Aetna Life and Casualty Company, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1958, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7111, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,137 Susan M. Barnes v. Independent Automobile Dealers Association of California Health and Welfare Benefit Plan, and Does 1 Through 25, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.