Legal Opinion
Watts v. Geisel
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 7, 1935No. 14,910PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDudine, P. J.
Appellee sued appellant for services rendered under and pursuant to an alleged contract.
The complaint consisted of two paragraphs. Appellant filed an answer in two paragraphs, viz., general denial and payment, and appellee filed a reply in general. denial.
The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and the court found for appellant on the first paragraph of complaint and for appellee on the second paragraph-of complaint, that the appellee was “entitled to -recover $1075.50 on the contract sued upon,” and rendered judgment accordingly.
Appellant seasonably filed a motion for new trial, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. GoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Ball v. BalfeIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Richardson v. Eagle Machine WorksIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Conrad v. HansenIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Guerrettaz v. Public Service Co. of Ind., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1949
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Town of Frankton v. ClosserIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
- Vernon L. Haag v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation, a Maryland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Bennett v. WamplerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.