State v. Falk
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.
Defendant Ronald Falk was convicted by jury of one count of possessing and one count of delivering heroin. On appeal he assigns error to the trial court's refusal to grant a mistrial, urging: (1) that the State had not disclosed defendant's prior incriminating statement; (2) that no CrR 3.5 hearing was conducted to determine voluntariness of the statement; and (3) introduction of the statement was improper rebuttal. We find no error and affirm.
Utilizing a confidential informant and undercover agents, the State supplied money to defendant to purchase heroin. Following an actual delivery of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. GreiffWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. OughtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- State v. BrushCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- State v. BebbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
- State v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.