Legal Opinion
Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided May 24, 1985No. 84-4056PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
ROBERT D. MORGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Charles R. Christianson and essentially his corporation, filed this complaint against Colt for damages, injunctive and equitable relief, under §§ 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 15 and 26), upon their allegations that Colt has violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2). Colt has answered denying violation and asserting numerous affirmative defenses and counterclaims. Venue exists in this district under 15 U.S.C. § 15 and 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c).
The complaint is grounded on…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Charles R. Christianson and International Trade Services, Inc., Etc. v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Charles R. Christianson, and International Trade Services, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation v. Colt Industries Operating CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Charles R. Christianson and International Trade Services Inc. v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.