Legal Opinion

Patrick Pontiac Nissan, Inc. v. Jotric Land Development

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking to recover the cost of repairs and improvements it made to property leased from defendant. Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment. Inasmuch as the lease contains no express covenant by defendant to repair or improve the leased premises, defendant had no obligation to make repairs or improvements or to pay for repairs or improvements made by plaintiff (see, Witty v Matthews, 52 NY 512, 514;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Surlak v. SurlakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Witty v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Potter v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Emigrant Industrial Savings Bank v. One Hundred Eight West Forty Ninth Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. Potter v. New York, Ontario & Western Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Broadway Central Property Inc. v. 682 Tenant Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API