Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Klarfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 4, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Claimant worked as a sales representative for a wholesale textile company for approximately 10 years. When she advised *1032her employer that she was leaving her job, she was asked to stay for an additional two weeks so that the employer could find a replacement. Although claimant initially agreed to do so, she changed her mind and left her job shortly thereafter. She applied for and received $1,350 in unemployment insurance benefits. However, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board subsequently ruled that she was disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily, left her employment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of Crandall-MarsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of ScirriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of PelcAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of ViohlAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re DickeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re the Claim of TsirakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of TsirakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- MatterofTsirakis[Commr.ofLabor]Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014