Legal Opinion

People v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 4, 1910PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, P. J.:

This controversy involves the right of the plaintiff to recover against the defendant a penalty under section 56 of the Public Service Commissions Law (Láws of 1907, chap. 429). ' By that section any common carrier subjects itself to a penalty not to exceed the sum of $5,000 for a violation of any of the requirements of the Public Service Commissions Law.

Defendant is charged with the violation of the provisions of section 55 of that law.' That section, so far as material to this controversy, reads as follows: “ A common carriel’, railroad corporation or street railroad…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. County Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Jones v. Hawaiian Elec. Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Staten Island Edison Corp. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Venner v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  5. Venner v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API