Blau v. Richman
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, P. J.,
— This matter comes before us on preliminary objections to a bill of complaint. The bill of complaint asks that a sale in bulk made by defendant Harry Feinstein to defendant Morris Rich-man be set aside because plaintiff, a business broker, who alleges he brought the parties together, had not as a creditor for commissions due him by Feinstein received notice *482of the sale in accordance with the terms of the Bulk Sales Act of May 23,1919, P. L. 262.
The sole question is whether plaintiff, as a broker claiming commissions from the vendor at the rate of 10 percent of the gross sale…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burnett v. TrimmellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
- George H. West Shoe Co. v. LemishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Interstate Shirt & Collar Co. v. WindhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Touris v. KarantzalisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.