Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America, Local 1139 v. Litton Microwave Cooking Products, Litton Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 6, 1983No. 81-2230Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partArnold, Circuit Judge

I agree that there was no abuse of discretion in denying the Union’s motion for attorneys’ fees. As to Part I of the Court’s opinion, however, I respectfully dissent.

On November 24,1980, Litton notified its employees that there would be an inventory shutdown during one week in March and that all employees who did not work then would have to take that week as paid vacation. Litton had, in the past, closed during the summer months and had not forced employees to take paid vacation during the inventory shutdown. That same day the union filed a grievance claiming that Litton was acting in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. General Telephone Co. Of Ohio v. Communications Workers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  4. Fabricut, Inc. v. Tulsa General Drivers, Warehousemen And Helpers, Local 523Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  5. Local 369, Bakery & Confectionery Workers International Union of America, Afl-Cio v. Cotton Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API