Legal Opinion

State v. Foster

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 29, 1918No. 20,920PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Proceeding in the district court for Brown county to charge defendant with being the father of a bastard child. The matter was tried before Olsen, J., who made findings and ordered judgment that defendant pay for the support of the child and give bond for the performance of the judgment. From an orden denying his motion for judgment in his favor or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Bastardy proceedings in which the state had judgment, and defendant appealed from an order denying a new trial.

1. The trial below was by the court without a jury, and defendant’s first contention in support of the appeal is that the findings of the trial court are not sustained by the evidence. We have examined the record with care and are unable to concur in that view of the case. A discussion of the evidence would serve no useful purpose. It is sufficient to say that we have given it due consideration, in connection with the brief and argument of defendant, with the result stated. We are…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DeikeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API