Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 18, 1986No. BH-224PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BARFIELD, Judge.

Again we are called upon to review a criminal sentence imposed in excess of the guidelines recommended sentence.

Appellant pled guilty to armed robbery of a convenience store. The trial court departed from the presumptive guidelines sentence of 4½ to 5¾⅞ years to impose a 15 year prison term. Six written reasons for departure were given.

The first reason for departure is identical to the first reason reviewed by this court in Battles v. State, 483 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), and is invalid for the reasons expressed in that decision.

The second reason relied on a negotiated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Albritton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. MischlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Geter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Battles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nodal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API