Central Barge Co. v. City of Minneapolis
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, Chief Judge.
The above cause came before the Court for trial without a jury.
This is a proceeding in admiralty and arises out of the breaking away of a *277barge owned by the libelant from respondent’s wharf on the Mississippi River at Minneapolis. Respondent is a municipality and charges a fee for its services in the unloading and the storage of the cargoes delivered at the wharf. The wharf is concrete and from above its outline forms a trapezoid with its base and two sides — extending north and south — along the shore line of the river. These walls, are used for the mooring of vessels.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Smith v. BurnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- CF HARMS CO. v. Erie R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Medomsley Steam Shipping Company v. Elizabeth River Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966