Legal Opinion

Central Barge Co. v. City of Minneapolis

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided June 28, 1954No. Civ. No. 4023PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

The above cause came before the Court for trial without a jury.

This is a proceeding in admiralty and arises out of the breaking away of a *277barge owned by the libelant from respondent’s wharf on the Mississippi River at Minneapolis. Respondent is a municipality and charges a fee for its services in the unloading and the storage of the cargoes delivered at the wharf. The wharf is concrete and from above its outline forms a trapezoid with its base and two sides — extending north and south — along the shore line of the river. These walls, are used for the mooring of vessels.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commercial Molasses Corp. v. New York Tank Barge Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Smith v. BurnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  4. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  5. CF HARMS CO. v. Erie R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Medomsley Steam Shipping Company v. Elizabeth River Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API