Legal Opinion

Daisley v. Osbourne

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 17, 2003No. 02-56624PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Robert Daisley and Lee Kerslake appeal summary judgment in favor of Ozzy Osbourne and others related to him, as well as the district court’s refusal to reconsider its ruling. Two claims remain at issue, for improper credit and for royalties based on an open book account. We affirm.

I

Whether or not an open book account was ever created, Daisley and Kerslake knew after settlement of the United Kingdom litigation in 1986 that they were not receiving royalties. They were told in July 1986 by Sharon Osbourne (who they knew spoke for the relevant entities) that the UK litigation and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Forsberg v. Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Cusano v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. R.N.C., Inc. v. TsegeletosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daisley v. OsbourneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API