Legal Opinion

Hope v. Highland County Board

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1990No. 90-179PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Adherence to the provisions of the appellate statutes is essential to confer jurisdiction upon the BTA to hear appeals. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. Bowers (1946), 147 Ohio St. 147, 34 O.O. 8, 70 N. E. 2d 93. R.C. 5717.01 is specific and mandatory. It requires that notice of appeal be filed by the appellant both with the board of revision and with the BTA. Failure to comply with the appellate statute is fatal to the appeal. Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1989), 46 Ohio St. 3d 192, 546 N.E. 2d 404. See, also, Fineberg v. Kosydar (1975), 44 Ohio St. 2d 1, 73 O. O. 2d 1, 335…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Fineberg v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Van De Hey v. Ashtabula Cty. Aud.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. Berea City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Commonwealth Upscale Properties, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Reserve Building Associates, Ltd. v. McCormackOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API