Legal Opinion

Maytham v. Parker

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mottos by defendant for an order directing a reference or a writ of inquiry.

1Opinion of the CourtEmery, J.

This is a motion made on the part of the defendant for an order directing a reference or a writ of inquiry to ascertain the damages sustained by the, defendant by reason of an injunction granted in the cause on the 26th day of June, 1912.

The plaintiff insists that, as no judgment has been rendered and entered in this action finally terminating the action, the motion for reference is premature.

There appears to be no authority precisely in point. *401Notwithstanding the language of the undertaking, “ if the court finally decides that the plaintiff is not entitled, thereto,” it is well settled that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. PollackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bator v. Hungarian Commercial Bank of PestDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  2. Rohman v. JafferAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API