Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Mango v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 2021No. 18AP-945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State ex rel. Mango v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.,

2021-Ohio-1314.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State ex rel. Raymond Mango, : Relator, : v. : No. 18AP-945 Ohio Department of Rehabilitation : (REGULAR CALENDAR) and Correction, : Respondent. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on April 15, 2021 On brief: Raymond Mango, pro se. On brief: Dave Yost, Attorney General, and Zachary S. O'Driscoll, for respondent. IN MANDAMUS ON OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE'S DECISION DORRIAN, P.J. {¶ 1} In this original action, relator, Raymond Mango, requests a writ of mandamus…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Lemmon v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mango v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State ex rel. Cartwright v. Ohio Adult Parole Bd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API